Well, the moment of truth has arrived: After minutes of careful consideration, I've selected the winners of the RPB t-shirt contest. And naturally, I've rated the poems according to our beloved 100-point scale!
You may be scandalized to hear that the top-rated entry was a haiku, rather than a limerick. No doubt there are some who would say that by its very nature, a limerick is a more noble varietal of poem (what, with all the rhyming), and that a haiku is deserving of no more than 87 points, but what does it matter what YOU think? I'M THE POEM CRITIC AND THE ONLY OPINION THAT MATTERS IS MINE! MINE, I TELL YOU! MWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!
But I digress. Following are the winning entries:
Parker sips my red
light body low alcohol
spits, screams: fifty points!
- Marco
RATING: 98
----------------
A wine is not bound by its rating
Though some would have you believe it's berating
To be below 85
Best be buried alive
Maybe I'll have a better chance wine spectating
- Rocket21
RATING: 96
----------------
Parkeresque wisdom
concentrate, yes concentrate
BOOM...an explosion
- Eric
RATING: 95
----------------
In my market with a yen for some Pinot,
to match with my Friday night beano,
My choices grew starker
whey I saw that Mr. Parker
had down rated my favorite vino.
- Bradley
RATING: 94
----------------
One day in the grocery store
I spied a real Parker whore
With Wine Advocate clutched
And his eyebrows bunched
For the 90-pointers were no more!
- Randy
RATING: 92 (bonus points for submitting a limerick, a haiku, free verse AND iambic pentameter!)
Thanks to all the poets for their clever entries: You guys rock. Winners: Be sure to shoot me an e-mail with your mailing address so I know where to send the booty (as in, your exquisite t-shirts).
As for those who didn't make the cut, don't be sad: There's a great "loser prize" too! T-shirts are expensive, but Target was having a sale on tighty-whities (only slightly used), so you'll be receiving a limited-production pair of exclusive RPB underpants! You think I'm kidding? Send me your mailing address, non-winners, and see what happens.
More Time To Blog: HA!
When I embarked on this latest chapter of my wine-writing career--that is, being a free agent rather than a magazine staffer--I optimistically announced to readers (and to myself) that I would now have more time for blogging.
As if.
I quicky discovered that without a regular paycheck, I would have to hustle to pay the bills. Pitch, pitch, pitch! Thankfully, I've had plenty of people come to me with offers of work, which has kept me amazingly busy--and as a result, kept me from spending my time on Ye Olde Bloge. (Write something I'm not getting paid for? You gots to be kidding!)
I think that's the trouble with professional writers having recreational blogs: When you spend your whole day writing, it's not always that thrilling to sit down at the end of the day and write some more--and it's even less motivational when you're doing it for free. The most avid wine bloggers, I've noticed, are people who don't spend eight hours a day writing about wine. Go figure.
Of course, the bonus of blogging is that you don't have to pitch your blog topics to some editor, who may very well reject them and crush your pathetic little dreams. You can be as controversial/goofy/irreverent as you damn well please.
Don't think I'm giving up on the blog, though. I've just returned from an amazing winery tour of Western Australia, where I collected plenty o' blog fodder. (I not only saw kangaroos, I ate 'em!)
Stay tuned, patient readers! As soon as I deal with these deadlines...
Posted at 02:34 PM in Random Comments | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)